What Saratov’s authorities want to demolish in 3rd Dachnaya: companies demand details of the security zone near the Rossiya Palace of Culture and decoding of the term “disharmonious”

Former Deputy Oleg Komarov asked the protection department of the UN to say what exactly is planned to be done in relation to the appearance of safety belts nearby DC “Russia”. He is the founder Kare LLCto which they belong Buy “Slavyansky” and the eponymous restaurant on 3rd Dachnaya, falling into these seat belts.

The entrepreneur wonders where the wording used by the project experts, such as “dissonance” / “disharmonious” buildings or “pool of visibility”, appears in the legislation.

As BV has already written, a historical and cultural expertise of the work of protected areas around DC “Russia”. There are supposed to be two of them – as well as zones to regulate growth and economic activity.

The experts obediently agreed with this, noting that, on the one hand, the overgrown fir trees near the regional administration and the nearby park, as well as the advertising banners, interfere with the admiration of the view of the Palace of Culture, and on the other hand, commercial stands.

At the same time, for some reason, the capital structure is also recorded in the latter – the Slavyansky market.

– During the landscape-optical analysis, it was revealed that the Slavyansky market and the surrounding commercial kiosks … restrict visibility in this direction, distort the views of the Object and are inconsistent with the Object in terms of scale and external characteristics. design, – experts conclude.

According Oleg Komarovhas nothing to do with benches – the land under them is leased by the businessman Alexandra Roslichenkoand the deal is brand new.

In addition, according to Saratov’s master plan, these benches should have been demolished a long time ago, but things are still there.

Meanwhile, in protected areas, capital and non-capital buildings can be demolished and construction is prohibited – with the exception of construction related to the restoration, reconstruction, replacement of partially or completely lost elements and (or) features of the historic city. and (or) natural environment. It is also allowed the restoration (renovation) of protected historic green spaces in the middle of the 20th century as an element of the historic urban environment.

Within the framework of the dead zone 2, the restoration (renovation) of the layout of the square is allowed. Lenin and look for them. 50 years of October in the middle of the twentieth century and the reconstruction of tram lines.

The project also imposes restrictions on the height of buildings and billboards and prohibits continuous glazing of street-facing facades. Odessa, International and pl. Lenin. Experts are also unhappy with the fir trees near the Leninsky district administration building, which, in their opinion, prevent them from admiring the “Rossiya” recreation center.

The experts’ conclusion caused Oleg Komarov reasonable confusion in the administration as well Kare LLC sent a request to the Department of Protection of OKN. The director asks for a protection belt project, as well as answers to a series of questions.

– What regulatory legal acts determine the legal definitions of the terms and concepts used in the Law (mismatched (disharmonious) buildings and structures, background and side buildings, zone of influence in the composition, group of visibility, etc.? – the businessmen ask.

And they ask to indicate which objects are allowed to be demolished in security zone No. 2 and why they are not mentioned in the examination report, who specifically will be responsible for the demolition of incompatible buildings, as well as which underground objects are in this zone and how they affect DC “Russia”.

The details of the project are also interesting: who ordered it, when the tender procedures took place.

In addition, entrepreneurs pay attention to the presence of comments from the administration about the project: in practice the examination is mentioned only in passing and these comments appeared only after the submission of the project of protected areas for general discussion. At the same time, the experts made changes not only in the documentation part of the document, but also in the land use regimes.

In a letter to Vladimir Mukhin it is concluded that the developers have exceeded the improvements suggested in the comments. And the opinion of experts on the need to correct the proposed schemes for the use of land and plots is unfounded and raises doubts about objectivity.

The letter states that most of the days when the public can discuss these amendments are holidays, in connection with which it is proposed to extend the period of public debates. So far, the department is in no hurry to respond to the request: the deadline for public hearings, despite the holidays, expired on May 16 and the project itself was removed from open access.

Leave a Comment